[USA] “EPA Grants $1.6 Million to Northwest and Alaska Tribal Groups to Reduce Harmful Diesel Emissions”

[EPA, 12 September 2018]

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has granted $1.6 million to three tribal groups in the Northwest and in Alaska; the Lummi and Tulalip Tribes (in Washington state) and the Tanana Chiefs Conference in Alaska. This award will be used to replace old diesel engines and generators thereby reducing the amount of harmful emissions the tribes will be exposed to. This award is provided under the EPA’s Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA). DERA works to reduce diesel combustion byproducts (e.g. hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter) by funding retrofit projects, engine replacements, and promotes idle reduction. Chris Hladick, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, stated “Clean diesel technologies not only improve air quality in Indian Country, but advance innovation and support jobs. These projects will significantly reduce harmful emissions and protect public health in tribal communities.” It is interesting to note the contrast between the work of EPA’s DERA to reduce harmful emissions and the EPA top administrators’ efforts to reduce vehicle tailpipe emissions standards.

[USA] “EPA Announces Availability of Funding to Reduce Emissions from Diesel Engines Nationwide”

[EPA, 24 April 2018]

The EPA has approved grant funding to reduce diesel emissions by retrofitting or replacing existing vehicles with cleaner and more efficient diesel engines. The Diesel Emission Reduction Program (DERA) provides about $40 million to eligible applicants; this program will end when funds are no longer available. Scott Pruitt, the EPA Administration, stated, “These grants will incentivize improvements to aging diesel fleets and improve air quality throughout the country.” Additionally, these funds will be prioritized for those in areas with “significant air quality issues” and fleets that are focused on transporting goods. Priority is also placed on those projects that support and benefit local communities and those projects/applicants that can show their intention and ability to continue emissions reductions even after the end of the project. 

[USA] “EPA Enforcement Rollback Could Increase Toxic Air Pollution, Science Group Says”

[Union of Concerned Scientists, 24 April 2018]

The EPA recently ended the “once in, always in” policy regarding polluters and their emissions- a change that “creates a loophole that would enable facilities to comply with weaker standards and reduce federal oversight,” according to the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). Polluters who emit these toxins (e.g. benzene, styrene, and formaldehyde) will have more leeway in their level of polluting emissions. Thousands of facilities would be able to petition for reclassification- which, UCS suggests, could add an extra 35,000 tons of pollution annually.  Though the exact impact of this change is still uncertain, UCS has stated that the new policy would have the greatest impact in 21 of the 50 states- specifically, areas that depend only on federal enforcement.